Current:Home > InvestFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Infinite Edge Capital
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-13 19:22:14
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (343)
Related
- Small twin
- From Tesla to SpaceX, what Elon Musk touches turns to gold. Twitter may be different
- How Lil Nas X Tapped In After Saweetie Called Him Her Celebrity Crush
- Some Twitter users flying the coop hope Mastodon will be a safe landing
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Why Olivia Culpo and Padma Lakshmi Are Getting Candid About Their Journeys With Endometriosis
- Twitter layoffs begin, sparking a lawsuit and backlash
- Elon Musk says Twitter bankruptcy is possible, but is that likely?
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Selena Gomez Is a Blushing Bride in Only Murders in the Building Behind-the-Scenes Photos
Ranking
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- How the gig economy inspired a cyberpunk video game
- Fears of crypto contagion are growing as another company's finances wobble
- FTC sues to block the $69 billion Microsoft-Activision Blizzard merger
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- France launches war crime investigation after reporter Arman Soldin killed in Ukraine
- Video games are tough on you because they love you
- Ashley Graham Celebrates Full Circle Moment Hosting HGTV's Barbie Dreamhouse Challenge
Recommendation
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Why Jana Kramer Believes Her Ex-Husband Would Have Cheated Forever If They Stay Married
These Are the 10 Best Strapless Bras for Every Bust Size, According to Reviewers
Elizabeth Holmes sentenced to 11 years in prison for Theranos fraud
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
Have you invested in crypto on FTX or other platforms? We want to hear from you
How the cookie became a monster
This Detangling Hairbrush With 73,000+ 5-Star Amazon Reviews Is on Sale for $12